What Is a Facility Relationship Graph for Permit to Work?
A machine-readable model of process, electrical, spatial, and isolation relationships that helps work-control teams trace how permits connect through the facility.
Read journalWork-Control Reasoning · PTW Context · Whole-JHA Intelligence
PERMITA is a graph-based work-control reasoning and intelligence platform that connects live Permit to Work context, Job Hazard Analyses, and facility relationships. Deterministic analysis produces traceable findings; the AI layer explains the coordinated work-control insight for authorised review.
The 3D model shows where the work is. The Facility Graph explains what it affects.
Interactive · NOVA-7 Synthetic Offshore Demonstrator
Click a PTW flag to inspect the job, contractor, work type, crew and linked JHA. Then run the PTW-to-PTW traversal. PERMITA reviews every Job Hazard Analysis as a whole, checks facility-graph and manpower evidence, and presents the coordinated Whole-JHA Insight.
Architecture
Every operator's permit forms, approval chains, and validity rules are different, so PERMITA treats them as configuration and mirrors them from your existing PTW procedure. The platform architecture is configurable; implementation focuses on your authority matrix, isolation philosophy, permit taxonomy, and facility topology. What never changes is the deterministic reasoning layer that evaluates work interactions through explicit rules and traceable relationships.
Permit categories, field layouts, validity windows, revalidation rules, and authority hierarchies configured from your PTW procedure. Crews see the permit they already know.
Permits, isolations, energy sources, and plant topology as a live graph. Every state change triggers a traversal: spatial, energy-source, activity-class, and multi-hop system conflicts — computed, logged, explainable.
Built for the deck, not the demo room
Manual reviews often focus on same-area, same-shift pairs. PERMITA traverses the plant graph — containment breaks, shared headers, vent routes, load paths, and linked work scopes — and can identify conflict chains that may be difficult to spot through conventional permit-board review.
Permit authority lives on the platform node. Issue, endorse, suspend, and close permits with no shore link; local actions are retained and synchronization occurs when connectivity returns. Designed for offshore intermittent-connectivity environments where data integrity and conflict handling remain important.
Isolations carry their own lifecycle, linked many-to-many to permits. "If I break this isolation, which live permits are affected?" is a one-line query — not a coordinator's memory.
Integration layer
Already operating an electronic Permit to Work system? PERMITA does not have to replace it. PERMITA can operate as an intelligence and analysis layer connected to your existing work-control environment.
Your ePTW continues to manage the permit workflow. PERMITA analyses the work context around it. Integration architecture is configured according to the operator's existing systems, available interfaces, and cybersecurity requirements.
Operational system of record where applicable. Permit workflow remains under operator control.
API integration, approved data exchange, scheduled synchronisation, or operator-defined interface, subject to implementation scope.
Evaluates relationships across permits, equipment, isolations, work locations, facility topology, simultaneous activities, and workflow status.
Detected conditions, SIMOPS indicators, affected permits or activities, traversed paths, triggered rules, and natural-language explanations.
Findings return to authorised personnel for review and action within the operator's existing process.
Subject to the operator's available data interfaces and implementation scope, PERMITA may analyse active permits, planned permits, permit type, work scope, equipment references, isolation references, work locations, facility topology, simultaneous activities, and workflow status.
Configure permit types, workflows, authority hierarchy, isolation philosophy, forms, and facility topology around the operator's work-control requirements.
Retain the existing ePTW and connect relevant work-control data to PERMITA for graph-based relationship analysis and traceable findings.
The safety case
"The model doesn't reason. The system reasons. The model speaks."
— Engineering Reasoning Model (ERM), AIMAILABS
PERMITA keeps work-control decisions grounded in explicit rules and traceable relationships. Deterministic logic identifies the condition and exposes the conflict path. The language model explains the result in clear operational language. AI does not approve permits or independently change workflow states.
Deployment & adoption
PERMITA deploys single-tenant — on-premises or in your private cloud — and provides a configurable platform architecture for your PTW procedure, authority matrix, isolation philosophy, permit taxonomy, and facility topology. The goal is to fit the operator's workflow, not replace it with a generic form layer.
Your PTW procedure and hardcopy forms become the configuration layer: permit types, approval DAG, validity and revalidation rules, required fields, and authority hierarchy.
Plant areas, adjacencies, key systems, and isolation points loaded into the graph from existing registers and P&ID data.
One asset runs PERMITA alongside the paper system. Every conflict the engine finds that the board missed is logged — your evidence file for full cutover.
Electronic permits go primary with an agreed paper fallback protocol, audit trail live, and platform-local support arrangements in place.
Journal
These journal entries turn PERMITA into a stronger topical hub for work-control reasoning, Facility Relationship Graphs, SIMOPS analysis, and semantic twin architecture. Each article is written for operators, engineers, and PTW teams rather than generic AI traffic.
A machine-readable model of process, electrical, spatial, and isolation relationships that helps work-control teams trace how permits connect through the facility.
Read journalWhy overlapping work activities can be better reviewed with explicit relationship paths instead of only same-tag or same-area permit checks.
Read journalHow a 3D facility layer, coded ontology, and deterministic reasoning engine can support traceable Operational and Safety Insights.
Read journalDesign-partner program
Send us a redacted month of closed permits and your PTW procedure. We'll load them into the graph and show you every conflict chain the manual review missed — before you commit to anything.
AIMAILABS Sdn Bhd · Malaysia · APAC · Anthropic Registered Partner